logo
ScholarJMS

Next-Gen Journal Management

Configuring Your Peer Review Workflow

How to configure single-blind, double-blind, or open peer review on ScholarJMS — reviewer assignment, deadlines, reminders, and editorial decisions.

Peer Review in ScholarJMS

ScholarJMS implements a configurable editorial workflow where editors assign reviewers, track review progress, and record decisions — all within a single interface. Authors receive automated notifications at each stage, and all communication is logged in the submission record.

Setting the Review Type

Go to Journal Settings → Peer Review → Review Type and select one of three modes:

Double-Blind (Default)

Reviewer and author identities are hidden from each other. ScholarJMS automatically strips author metadata from the document cover page visible to reviewers.

Single-Blind

Reviewer identity is hidden; the author is known to the reviewer. Reviewer names are not disclosed to authors in correspondence.

Open Review

Both identities are disclosed throughout the process. Review reports can optionally be published alongside the article.

Assigning Reviewers

From the submission record, click Assign Reviewer. You can:

  • Search the reviewer database by name, institution, or research keyword
  • Import external reviewers by entering their email (they receive an invitation and can register if they are new)
  • Set a review deadline (default from settings, overridable per assignment)
  • Add a personal note to the reviewer invitation email

Best practice: Assign 2–3 reviewers per submission. ScholarJMS flags submissions where fewer than two reviews have been received by the deadline.

Automated Reminders

Under Journal Settings → Email Notifications, configure automated reminders:

Reviewer Reminders

Sent 7 days and 2 days before the review deadline. A final overdue notice fires 1 day after the deadline.

Author Status Updates

Automatic notifications when a submission enters review, when a revision is requested, and when a final decision is made.

Recording Decisions

Once reviews are in, open the submission and click Make Decision. Available decisions:

Accept

Minor Revisions

Major Revisions

Reject

Each decision triggers a customizable email to the author. Decision letters and review reports are archived permanently in the submission record.

Tip: Use the Editorial Report under Analytics to track average review turnaround time and reviewer response rate per issue.

Keywords

#peer review#reviewer assignment#editorial workflow#double-blind#review deadlines#editor guide

Related documentation

EditorialFeatured

Getting Started: Setting Up Your Journal on ScholarJMS

Setting up a journal on ScholarJMS takes under 30 minutes. This guide walks you through account creation, journal profile configuration, domain connection, and first-issue setup so your editorial workflow is ready to receive submissions on day one.

3
2 min
Updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:28 PM
Author GuidelinesFeatured

Author Guide: How to Submit a Manuscript

Submitting a manuscript through ScholarJMS takes about 10 minutes. This guide explains how to create an author account, prepare your files, complete the submission form, and track your submission status through the review process.

2
2 min
Updated: Aug 11, 2026 11:51 AM
EditorialFeatured

Setting Up CrossRef DOI Registration on ScholarJMS

ScholarJMS automates CrossRef DOI registration. Once your CrossRef member credentials are entered, DOIs are assigned at article publication and metadata is deposited to CrossRef automatically — no manual XML export required.

4
2 min
Updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:29 PM
ComplianceFeatured

Applying to DOAJ: Requirements and How to Prepare

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) is the most widely recognised open access directory for academic journals. This guide explains DOAJ's current acceptance criteria and how ScholarJMS helps your journal meet them.

3
2 min
Updated: Aug 11, 2026 11:39 AM